How Men More Involved In Unintentional Injuries – Today’s guest blog is by the Pacific Attorney Group. The opinions expressed by the author in this and all guest blogs are not necessarily those of Genex Medical Staffing.
How Men More Involved In Unintentional Injuries
Unintentional Injuries are generally preventable and fall under two categories: nonfatal or fatal. Men are about twice as likely as women to die from accidental damage, with the foremost common causes of deadly injuries being overdose, automobile accidents (MVA), and falls. Against this, the only common causes of nonfatal injuries are falls, inadvertent strike, and overexertion. Here it’ll be discussed how men are mostly gets involved in such damages.
- Occupational Accidents/Injuries
The rate of occupational injuries has steadily decreased since 2003, with overexertion and falls being the foremost common causes of nonfatal damage resulting in disability. The industries with the very best rates of nonfatal occupational injury in 2016 were health care, construction, public safety, and manufacturing.
Industries with the high fatal occupational injuries rate include agriculture, construction, transportation, and warehousing. Occupational injury deaths were most typical within the 45 to 54-year-old and 55 to 64-year-old age groups.
- Injuries Due To Falls
Falls were the only common explanation for death from unintentional injury in men above the age of 60. Men are more likely to suffer more than women. Women are more likely to suffer a nonfatal fall.
- Injuries Because Of Guns
Nonfatal unintentional injuries from guns remained at about 0.011% of the man population between 2001 and 2015, rising from 11,252 injuries to 13,335 injuries. During this duration, the very high damage rates were experienced by the 20 to 24-year-old age bracket, followed by the 25 to 29-year-old age bracket. Fatal unintentional injuries from guns decreased steadily during this point.
Why Men Are At Higher Risk of Injuries
There are several proposed theories, one among which is that there are societal gender norms that promote risk-taking behavior in men. It might stem from the thought that maleness is usually defined by strength and independence. These gender expectations are found in children as young as ten years old.
Such industries include fishing, construction, public service, military, and mining. In two occupations-firefighting and mining-chivalry and fearlessness within the face of risky work are ingrained within the workplace culture, which serves to fortify gender socialization and empower men to satisfy an exemplary male paradigm of the monetary supplier.
Regarding this cultural agreement and development of gender, it’s not astonishing then that men in many of these high-hazard occupations have come to standardize withstanding actual strain and torment as an important, if not compensated, trademark viewpoint of the work. These factors establish a climate helpful for inadvertent word related injury in men by adjusting laborers to challenging work and actual strain.
While gender socialization and norms may heighten high-risk environments, substance use has played a significant role in the increased incidence of fatalities. Compared to women, men have increased dopamine stimulation in response to substances almost like alcohol, which is involved in the reward mechanism.
There is also one thing that exists is the intersection between masculine norms and alcoholism. Male examples like risk-taking are shown to extend the likelihood of alcohol-related problems. There is a considerable need for more research to know the role of gender in substance use disorder, specifically opioids.
